marveldene

BlueJI in 197et (= Duodene, etc, in 197et)

Properties

Notes12
Period1200.0 ¢
JustNo
Source Mailing lists
Referencehttps://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_96148.html#96156
Thread1 scale
Tone (¢) Step (¢)
116 116
201 85
317 116
384 67
499 116
585 85
701 116
816 116
883 67
1017 134
1084 67
1200 116

Similar scales

FileNotesRotationMax diff (¢)
phillips_tuning_39746_39990 12 11 1.3
duo 12 0 1.4
dwarf12marv 12 3 1.6
nptmarv 12 0 2.3
raven_tuning_104807_104811 12 0 4.0
dwarf12_7 12 0 4.0
ji_12 12 0 4.0
reflections 12 4 4.0
blueji-cataclysmic 12 0 4.8
syndie3 12 2 5.5

Parent scales

FileNotesMax diff (¢)
dwarf15marv 15 1.6
dwarf19marv 19 1.6
diamond9plus-marvel 21 0.3
keenan5 22 0.3
rosatimarv 21 1.6
cpak19a 19 4.0
hahn19 19 4.0
mandelbaum7 19 4.0
mandelbaum7keemun 19 4.0
metdia 19 4.0

Child scales

FileNotesMax diff (¢)
semafip 9 0.6
qm2 7 0.9
xen15-chalmers-triadic-diamond-8192-6561 7 1.4
xen03-wilson-negative-05 5 1.4
xen15-chalmers-triadic-reversed-diamond-8192-6561 7 2.1
genggong 5 2.6
fivecrys1 7 2.6
xen15-chalmers-triadic-diamond-5-4 7 2.6
xen18-ayers-table-41-42 7 2.6
mavchrome6 7 2.9
Mailing list post
From: genewardsmith (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: 1/4 comma meantone

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Chris Vaisvil <chrisvaisvil@...> wrote:
>
> and I think this is the other

And to complete the picture, here is BlueJI in 197 equal:

! marveldene.scl
BlueJI in 197et (= Duodene, etc, in 197et)
12
!
115.73604
201.01523
316.75127
383.75635
499.49239
584.77157
700.50761
816.24365
883.24873
1017.25888
1084.26396
1200.00000
Full thread (9 messages)
From: john777music (2011-02-10)
Subject: 1/4 comma meantone

Igs said:

<...your temperament is ... something which really isn't all that different than 1/4-comma meantone or the Meantone[12] scale in 31-EDO.>

and...

<it's not true that you've improved on 12-tET--you've simply reinstated Meantone and given it your own personal well-tempered twist>

and...

<Thus, your tuning does not compete with 12-tET, because it does not improve on the features that initially made 12-tET popular>

I need to look into this.

Could someone please post the frequencies (in cents) of both 12 key quarter comma Meantone and the Meantone[12] scale in 31EDO?

The meantone I stumbled across years go started with 1.0 as the tonic and going *up* from 1.0 I multiplied each step by 2.99069756/2 (2.99069756 is the 4th root of 80). I did 8 steps going *up* from 1.0. Next I did 8 steps going *down* from 1.0 (this time each step was divided by 2.99069756/2. A total of 17 keys per octave. 

So I'm not sure what regular 12 tone 1/4 comma Meantone is. Is it 1.0 multiplied by 2.99069756/2 12 times?

As I said before my method for building scales has nothing at all to do with commas and tempering them out and if my scale does look a bit like 1/4 comma meantone then it's purely a coincidence. I'd also like to analyze the two Meantones Igs mentioned above and compare them to my Blue Temperament scale to see how many good harmony intervals (an octave or less wide) occur. For me each note should go with the tonic as well. If either of these two Meantone scales turn out better than my Blue Temperament I'll eat my hat.

Again, could someone please post the frequencies (in cents) of both 12 key quarter comma Meantone and the Meantone[12] scale in 31EDO?

John.
From: Chris Vaisvil (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: [tuning] 1/4 comma meantone

I think this is one

|
12 out of 31-tET, meantone Eb-G#
|
  0:          1/1               0.000  unison, perfect prime
  1:         77.419 cents      77.419
  2:        193.548 cents     193.548
  3:        309.677 cents     309.677
  4:        387.097 cents     387.097
  5:        503.226 cents     503.226
  6:        580.645 cents     580.645
  7:        696.774 cents     696.774
  8:        774.194 cents     774.194
  9:        890.323 cents     890.323
 10:       1006.452 cents    1006.452
 11:       1083.871 cents    1083.871
 12:          2/1            1200.000  octave

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:55 AM, john777music <jfos777@...> wrote:

>
>
> Igs said:
>
> <...your temperament is ... something which really isn't all that different
> than 1/4-comma meantone or the Meantone[12] scale in 31-EDO.>
>
> and...
>
> <it's not true that you've improved on 12-tET--you've simply reinstated
> Meantone and given it your own personal well-tempered twist>
>
> and...
>
> <Thus, your tuning does not compete with 12-tET, because it does not
> improve on the features that initially made 12-tET popular>
>
> I need to look into this.
>
> Could someone please post the frequencies (in cents) of both 12 key quarter
> comma Meantone and the Meantone[12] scale in 31EDO?
>
> The meantone I stumbled across years go started with 1.0 as the tonic and
> going *up* from 1.0 I multiplied each step by 2.99069756/2 (2.99069756 is
> the 4th root of 80). I did 8 steps going *up* from 1.0. Next I did 8 steps
> going *down* from 1.0 (this time each step was divided by 2.99069756/2. A
> total of 17 keys per octave.
>
> So I'm not sure what regular 12 tone 1/4 comma Meantone is. Is it 1.0
> multiplied by 2.99069756/2 12 times?
>
> As I said before my method for building scales has nothing at all to do
> with commas and tempering them out and if my scale does look a bit like 1/4
> comma meantone then it's purely a coincidence. I'd also like to analyze the
> two Meantones Igs mentioned above and compare them to my Blue Temperament
> scale to see how many good harmony intervals (an octave or less wide) occur.
> For me each note should go with the tonic as well. If either of these two
> Meantone scales turn out better than my Blue Temperament I'll eat my hat.
>
> Again, could someone please post the frequencies (in cents) of both 12 key
> quarter comma Meantone and the Meantone[12] scale in 31EDO?
>
> John.
>
>  
>
From: Chris Vaisvil (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: [tuning] 1/4 comma meantone

and I think this is the other

1/4-comma meantone scale. Pietro Aaron's temp. (1523). 6/5 beats twice 3/2
|
  0:          1/1               0.000  unison, perfect prime
  1:         76.049 cents      76.049
  2:        193.157 cents     193.157
  3:        310.265 cents     310.265
  4:        386.314 cents     386.314
  5:        503.422 cents     503.422
  6:        579.471 cents     579.471
  7:        696.578 cents     696.578
  8:        772.627 cents     772.627
  9:        889.735 cents     889.735
 10:       1006.843 cents    1006.843
 11:       1082.892 cents    1082.892
 12:          2/1            1200.000  octave


On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Chris Vaisvil <chrisvaisvil@...>wrote:

> I think this is one
>
> |
> 12 out of 31-tET, meantone Eb-G#
> |
>   0:          1/1               0.000  unison, perfect prime
>   1:         77.419 cents      77.419
>   2:        193.548 cents     193.548
>   3:        309.677 cents     309.677
>   4:        387.097 cents     387.097
>   5:        503.226 cents     503.226
>   6:        580.645 cents     580.645
>   7:        696.774 cents     696.774
>   8:        774.194 cents     774.194
>   9:        890.323 cents     890.323
>  10:       1006.452 cents    1006.452
>  11:       1083.871 cents    1083.871
>  12:          2/1            1200.000  octave
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:55 AM, john777music <jfos777@...> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Igs said:
>>
>> <...your temperament is ... something which really isn't all that
>> different than 1/4-comma meantone or the Meantone[12] scale in 31-EDO.>
>>
>> and...
>>
>> <it's not true that you've improved on 12-tET--you've simply reinstated
>> Meantone and given it your own personal well-tempered twist>
>>
>> and...
>>
>> <Thus, your tuning does not compete with 12-tET, because it does not
>> improve on the features that initially made 12-tET popular>
>>
>> I need to look into this.
>>
>> Could someone please post the frequencies (in cents) of both 12 key
>> quarter comma Meantone and the Meantone[12] scale in 31EDO?
>>
>> The meantone I stumbled across years go started with 1.0 as the tonic and
>> going *up* from 1.0 I multiplied each step by 2.99069756/2 (2.99069756 is
>> the 4th root of 80). I did 8 steps going *up* from 1.0. Next I did 8 steps
>> going *down* from 1.0 (this time each step was divided by 2.99069756/2. A
>> total of 17 keys per octave.
>>
>> So I'm not sure what regular 12 tone 1/4 comma Meantone is. Is it 1.0
>> multiplied by 2.99069756/2 12 times?
>>
>> As I said before my method for building scales has nothing at all to do
>> with commas and tempering them out and if my scale does look a bit like 1/4
>> comma meantone then it's purely a coincidence. I'd also like to analyze the
>> two Meantones Igs mentioned above and compare them to my Blue Temperament
>> scale to see how many good harmony intervals (an octave or less wide) occur.
>> For me each note should go with the tonic as well. If either of these two
>> Meantone scales turn out better than my Blue Temperament I'll eat my hat.
>>
>> Again, could someone please post the frequencies (in cents) of both 12 key
>> quarter comma Meantone and the Meantone[12] scale in 31EDO?
>>
>> John.
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
From: genewardsmith (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: 1/4 comma meantone

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Chris Vaisvil <chrisvaisvil@...> wrote:
>
> and I think this is the other

And to complete the picture, here is BlueJI in 197 equal:

! marveldene.scl
BlueJI in 197et (= Duodene, etc, in 197et)
12
!
115.73604
201.01523
316.75127
383.75635
499.49239
584.77157
700.50761
816.24365
883.24873
1017.25888
1084.26396
1200.00000
From: john777music (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: 1/4 comma meantone

What does Blue JI in 197 equal mean? Does it mean that all the notes in 197 equal are listed and then the 12 notes that are closest to Blue JI are chosen from the list?

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "genewardsmith" <genewardsmith@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Chris Vaisvil <chrisvaisvil@> wrote:
> >
> > and I think this is the other
> 
> And to complete the picture, here is BlueJI in 197 equal:
> 
> ! marveldene.scl
> BlueJI in 197et (= Duodene, etc, in 197et)
> 12
> !
> 115.73604
> 201.01523
> 316.75127
> 383.75635
> 499.49239
> 584.77157
> 700.50761
> 816.24365
> 883.24873
> 1017.25888
> 1084.26396
> 1200.00000
>
From: genewardsmith (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: 1/4 comma meantone

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "john777music" <jfos777@...> wrote:
>
> What does Blue JI in 197 equal mean? Does it mean that all the notes in 197 equal are listed and then the 12 notes that are closest to Blue JI are chosen from the list?

Sadly, no. It means 197 times the log base two for each of the primes up to 7 was rounded to the nearest integer, giving the "patent val" mapping of <197 312 457 553|, and then this mapping was applied to each of the intervals of BlueJI and the result converted to cents by multiplying by 1200/197. But I think you'll find the result is much closer to BlueJI that what 31, using the same process, gave you.
From: john777music (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: 1/4 comma meantone

Thanks Gene, 

I'll take your word for it ;-)

John.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "genewardsmith" <genewardsmith@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "john777music" <jfos777@> wrote:
> >
> > What does Blue JI in 197 equal mean? Does it mean that all the notes in 197 equal are listed and then the 12 notes that are closest to Blue JI are chosen from the list?
> 
> Sadly, no. It means 197 times the log base two for each of the primes up to 7 was rounded to the nearest integer, giving the "patent val" mapping of <197 312 457 553|, and then this mapping was applied to each of the intervals of BlueJI and the result converted to cents by multiplying by 1200/197. But I think you'll find the result is much closer to BlueJI that what 31, using the same process, gave you.
>
From: genewardsmith (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: 1/4 comma meantone

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "john777music" <jfos777@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Gene, 
> 
> I'll take your word for it ;-)

Instead of doing that, why not compare it to meantone and BlueJI?
From: john777music (2011-02-10)
Subject: Re: 1/4 comma meantone

Okay, I will.




--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "genewardsmith" <genewardsmith@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "john777music" <jfos777@> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Gene, 
> > 
> > I'll take your word for it ;-)
> 
> Instead of doing that, why not compare it to meantone and BlueJI?
>

Raw file

! marveldene.scl
BlueJI in 197et (= Duodene, etc, in 197et)
12
!
115.73604
201.01523
316.75127
383.75635
499.49239
584.77157
700.50761
816.24365
883.24873
1017.25888
1084.26396
1200.00000
!
! https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_96148.html#96156
!
! [info]
! source = Mailing lists
! file = tuning/messages/yahoo_tuning_messages_api_raw_90000-106393.json
! topic_id = 96148
! msg_id = 96156