16-miracle-oct

21 out of 72 within 2/1 miracle scale, from 16-of-53 within 5/3

Properties

Notes21
Period1200.0 ¢
JustNo
Source Mailing lists
Referencehttps://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_28290.html#28290
Thread2 scales
Tone (¢) Step (¢)
83 83
117 33
200 83
233 33
317 83
350 33
383 33
467 83
500 33
583 83
617 33
700 83
733 33
767 33
850 83
883 33
967 83
1000 33
1083 83
1117 33
1200 83

Parent scales

FileNotesMax diff (¢)
rational_canasta_tuning_22793_23190 31 0.6
xen18-erlich-miracle-31 31 0.7
rational_canasta 31 1.8
keenan5_269 31 2.4
keenan5_tuning_7341_7341 31 3.2
qx2 31 3.9
miracle3 41 0.0
woz31 31 4.3
newts 41 0.6
xen18-erlich-miracle-41 41 0.7

Child scales

FileNotesMax diff (¢)
xen18-erlich-miracle-11 11 0.6
xen18-erlich-miracle-10 10 0.6
xen18-erlich-miracle-09 9 0.6
xen18-erlich-miracle-08 8 0.6
xen18-erlich-miracle-07 7 0.6
xen18-erlich-miracle-06 6 0.6
xen18-erlich-miracle-05 5 0.6
2.3.5-7.11-9.diamond 10 2.8
xen18-erlich-cynder-06 6 3.3
xen18-erlich-cynder-05 5 3.3
Mailing list post
From: genewardsmith@juno.com (2001-09-18)
Subject: More on miracles

As I posted over on tuning-math, the "miracle" phenomenon is the 
second of a class of similar such miracles, the first of which is the 
meantone, and the third of which has a generator of around 35.4 
cents. The miracle generator lies between 16/15 at 111.7 cents and 
15/14 at 119.4 cents, analogously to the way the meantone lies 
between 10/9 and 9/8. Scales constructed by iterating the miracle 
generator are therefore analogous to scales constructed by iterating 
the meantone; however what is actually done in that case is to take 
advantage of the fact that the numerator of 9/8 is a square, so that 
9/8 = (3/2)^2 2^(-1), and then iterate the 3/2 within the 2. If we 
were to proceed in an analogous manner with the miracle generator, we 
would take advantage of the fact that the numerator of 16/15 is a 
square, and factor it as 16/15 = (4/3)^2 (5/3)^(-1); we would then 
look for a miracle fourth in analogy to the meantone fifth to iterate 
within 5/3, producing mean semitone systems.

To get the meantone fifth, we select a value for the meantone m of 
m=sqrt(5/4), which gives us pure thirds, and then take the fifth to 
be sqrt(2m). To get a miracle fourth, we can similarly select a value 
s for the mean semitone of sqrt(8/7) = 115.6 cents,
giving us a miracle fourth of sqrt((5/3)s); however of more 
significance we can require instead that we have pure octaves, which 
we will obtain if we set s = (12/5)^(1/13) = 116.6 cents, very close 
to the 72-et value of 2^(7/72) = 116 2/3 cents, as well as to the 
value 116.7 attributed to Keenan and Secor on Joe Monzo's web page. 
This in turn leads to a miracle fourth of sqrt((5/3)s) = 500.5 cents 
which we can interate within a major sixth. 

The 72-et approximates 4/3 by 2^(30/72) and 5/3 by 2^(53/72); if we 
want MOS scales within 53 divisions of 5/3, we can look at the 
semiconvergents to 30/53, which give us 4/7, 5/9, 9/16, 13/23, and 
17/30. If we look for instance at 16 steps out of 53, we get steps of 
size 5252522525252252 which repeat within an interval of repetition 
5/3. If we prefer octaves, we can easily extend the pattern until we 
reach an octave, and repeat within that; in this way we would get 
525252252525225252525, which has the slightly irregular feature of 
two steps of 5 in sequence. If we pick representative intervals 
approximated by these steps, we get

1-21/20-15/14-9/8-8/7-6/5-11/9-5/4-21/16-4/3-7/5-10/7-3/2-32/21-
14/9-18/11-5/3-7/4-16/9-15/8-40/21-(2)

which gives us some idea of the resources of this scale, in either of 
its forms. If we compare it to Blackjack, we have instead 
525252525252525252522; we have again 10 5's and 11 2's, but 
distributed differently.

If anyone wants to try this out, the version within 5/3 is given by

! 16-miracle.scl
!
16 out of 53 within 5/3 miracle scale
16
!
83.43006824
116.8020936
200.2321622
233.6041876
317.0342560
350.4062819
383.7783092
467.2083755
500.5804036
584.0104712
617.3824974
700.8125646
734.1845918
767.5566184
850.9866863
5/3

The version inside an octave is

! 16-miracle-oct.scl
!
21 out of 72 within 2/1 miracle scale, from 16-of-53 within 5/3
21
!
83.33333333
116.6666667
200.0000000
233.3333333
316.6666667
350.0000000
383.3333333
466.6666667
500.0000000
583.3333333
616.6666667
700.0000000
733.3333333
766.6666667
850.0000000
883.3333333
966.6666667
1000.000000
1083.333333
1116.666666
2/1
Full thread (4 messages)
From: genewardsmith@juno.com (2001-09-18)
Subject: More on miracles

As I posted over on tuning-math, the "miracle" phenomenon is the 
second of a class of similar such miracles, the first of which is the 
meantone, and the third of which has a generator of around 35.4 
cents. The miracle generator lies between 16/15 at 111.7 cents and 
15/14 at 119.4 cents, analogously to the way the meantone lies 
between 10/9 and 9/8. Scales constructed by iterating the miracle 
generator are therefore analogous to scales constructed by iterating 
the meantone; however what is actually done in that case is to take 
advantage of the fact that the numerator of 9/8 is a square, so that 
9/8 = (3/2)^2 2^(-1), and then iterate the 3/2 within the 2. If we 
were to proceed in an analogous manner with the miracle generator, we 
would take advantage of the fact that the numerator of 16/15 is a 
square, and factor it as 16/15 = (4/3)^2 (5/3)^(-1); we would then 
look for a miracle fourth in analogy to the meantone fifth to iterate 
within 5/3, producing mean semitone systems.

To get the meantone fifth, we select a value for the meantone m of 
m=sqrt(5/4), which gives us pure thirds, and then take the fifth to 
be sqrt(2m). To get a miracle fourth, we can similarly select a value 
s for the mean semitone of sqrt(8/7) = 115.6 cents,
giving us a miracle fourth of sqrt((5/3)s); however of more 
significance we can require instead that we have pure octaves, which 
we will obtain if we set s = (12/5)^(1/13) = 116.6 cents, very close 
to the 72-et value of 2^(7/72) = 116 2/3 cents, as well as to the 
value 116.7 attributed to Keenan and Secor on Joe Monzo's web page. 
This in turn leads to a miracle fourth of sqrt((5/3)s) = 500.5 cents 
which we can interate within a major sixth. 

The 72-et approximates 4/3 by 2^(30/72) and 5/3 by 2^(53/72); if we 
want MOS scales within 53 divisions of 5/3, we can look at the 
semiconvergents to 30/53, which give us 4/7, 5/9, 9/16, 13/23, and 
17/30. If we look for instance at 16 steps out of 53, we get steps of 
size 5252522525252252 which repeat within an interval of repetition 
5/3. If we prefer octaves, we can easily extend the pattern until we 
reach an octave, and repeat within that; in this way we would get 
525252252525225252525, which has the slightly irregular feature of 
two steps of 5 in sequence. If we pick representative intervals 
approximated by these steps, we get

1-21/20-15/14-9/8-8/7-6/5-11/9-5/4-21/16-4/3-7/5-10/7-3/2-32/21-
14/9-18/11-5/3-7/4-16/9-15/8-40/21-(2)

which gives us some idea of the resources of this scale, in either of 
its forms. If we compare it to Blackjack, we have instead 
525252525252525252522; we have again 10 5's and 11 2's, but 
distributed differently.

If anyone wants to try this out, the version within 5/3 is given by

! 16-miracle.scl
!
16 out of 53 within 5/3 miracle scale
16
!
83.43006824
116.8020936
200.2321622
233.6041876
317.0342560
350.4062819
383.7783092
467.2083755
500.5804036
584.0104712
617.3824974
700.8125646
734.1845918
767.5566184
850.9866863
5/3

The version inside an octave is

! 16-miracle-oct.scl
!
21 out of 72 within 2/1 miracle scale, from 16-of-53 within 5/3
21
!
83.33333333
116.6666667
200.0000000
233.3333333
316.6666667
350.0000000
383.3333333
466.6666667
500.0000000
583.3333333
616.6666667
700.0000000
733.3333333
766.6666667
850.0000000
883.3333333
966.6666667
1000.000000
1083.333333
1116.666666
2/1
From: jpehrson@rcn.com (2001-09-23)
Subject: Re: More on miracles

--- In tuning@y..., genewardsmith@j... wrote:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/28290

> As I posted over on tuning-math, the "miracle" phenomenon is the 
> second of a class of similar such miracles, the first of which is 
the 
> meantone, and the third of which has a generator of around 35.4 
> cents. The miracle generator lies between 16/15 at 111.7 cents and 
> 15/14 at 119.4 cents, analogously to the way the meantone lies 
> between 10/9 and 9/8. Scales constructed by iterating the miracle 
> generator are therefore analogous to scales constructed by 
iterating the meantone

Thank you, Gene, for bringing these discoveries over to this list...

I guess we had discussed before the relationship of 31-tET, with, I 
believe, a generator of 116.129 cents or 1/3 comma meantone with the 
generator of the miracle family 116.667.

31-tET is, of course, also a fine scale for just harmonies, minor 
thirds in particular, so it was interesting to see how such a small 
variation of the "generator" could produce so many scales containing 
just intervals...

I think I'm getting this right...

________ _______ _________
Joseph Pehrson
From: Paul Erlich (2001-09-24)
Subject: Re: More on miracles

--- In tuning@y..., jpehrson@r... wrote:

> I guess we had discussed before the relationship of 31-tET, with, I 
> believe, a generator of 116.129 cents or 1/3 comma meantone

31-tET <-> 1/4-comma meantone
19-tET <-> 1/3-comma meantone

> with the 
> generator of the miracle family 116.667.
> 
> 31-tET is, of course, also a fine scale for just harmonies, minor 
> thirds in particular,

Major thirds in particular?
From: jpehrson@rcn.com (2001-09-24)
Subject: Re: More on miracles

--- In tuning@y..., "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/28531

> --- In tuning@y..., jpehrson@r... wrote:
> 
> > I guess we had discussed before the relationship of 31-tET, with, 
I 
> > believe, a generator of 116.129 cents or 1/3 comma meantone
> 
> 31-tET <-> 1/4-comma meantone
> 19-tET <-> 1/3-comma meantone
> 
> > with the 
> > generator of the miracle family 116.667.
> > 
> > 31-tET is, of course, also a fine scale for just harmonies, minor 
> > thirds in particular,
> 
> Major thirds in particular?

Thanks, Paul... for correcting that slip....

_________ _______ _________
Joseph Pehrson

Raw file

! 16-miracle-oct.scl
!
21 out of 72 within 2/1 miracle scale, from 16-of-53 within 5/3
21
!
83.33333333
116.6666667
200.0000000
233.3333333
316.6666667
350.0000000
383.3333333
466.6666667
500.0000000
583.3333333
616.6666667
700.0000000
733.3333333
766.6666667
850.0000000
883.3333333
966.6666667
1000.000000
1083.333333
1116.666666
2/1
!
! https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_28290.html#28290
!
! [info]
! source = Mailing lists
! file = tuning/messages/yahoo_tuning_messages_api_raw_25105-30000.json
! topic_id = 28290
! msg_id = 28290