Topic: A new JI scale
1 scales
| File | Description | Notes | Period (¢) | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| harcb12 | Scale of 16 harmonics from C and 16 subharmonics from B | 12 | 1200.0 | 13 |
Thread (10 messages)
From: Petr Pařízek (2005-11-23) Subject: A new JI scale Hi all. Here I'm sending a new scale I made yesterday. It contains a part of the harmonic series up to the 16th harmonic (i.e. from C upwards) and also a part of the subharmonic series up to the 16th subharmonic (from B downwards). The interesting thing about this is that I managed to "squeeze" all this into just a 12-tone scale. Petr ! harcb12.scl ! Scale of 16 harmonics from C and 16 subharmonics from B ! November 2005 - Petr Parizek 12 ! 15/14 9/8 15/13 5/4 15/11 11/8 3/2 13/8 5/3 7/4 15/8 2/1
From: Gene Ward Smith (2005-11-23) Subject: Re: A new JI scale --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Petr Paøízek wrote: > > Hi all. > Here I'm sending a new scale I made yesterday. It contains a part of the > harmonic series up to the 16th harmonic (i.e. from C upwards) and also a > part of the subharmonic series up to the 16th subharmonic (from B > downwards). The interesting thing about this is that I managed to "squeeze" > all this into just a 12-tone scale. Not only that, but a scale epimorphic with the standard val, and constant structure. If someone wants to retune 12-equal music in a seriously warped way, this would be one thing to try.
From: George D. Secor (2005-11-23) Subject: Re: A new JI scale --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Petr Paøízek wrote: > > Hi all. > Here I'm sending a new scale I made yesterday. It contains a part of the > harmonic series up to the 16th harmonic (i.e. from C upwards) and also a > part of the subharmonic series up to the 16th subharmonic (from B > downwards). The interesting thing about this is that I managed to "squeeze" > all this into just a 12-tone scale. > Petr > > ! harcb12.scl > ! > Scale of 16 harmonics from C and 16 subharmonics from B > ! November 2005 - Petr Parizek > 12 > ! > 15/14 > 9/8 > 15/13 > 5/4 > 15/11 > 11/8 > 3/2 > 13/8 > 5/3 > 7/4 > 15/8 > 2/1 Very nice! -- but unfortunately not new. This is one of the two best 13-limit JI scales I came up with over 30 years ago: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/60761 And I suspect that I may not have been the first to find these. --George
From: Haresh BAKSHI (2005-11-23) Subject: Re: A new JI scale Hi ALL, Similarly for the raga-s. Some very beautiful raga "comes" to you, quite independently. But, later, you are told that the same raga has been in existence already, having a different name. The originality and creativity of the later recipient of the gift, of course, enjoys the same status as that of the first one. Regards, Haresh. --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "George D. Secor" <gdsecor@y...> wrote: > > Very nice! -- but unfortunately not new. This is one of the two best > 13-limit JI scales I came up with over 30 years ago: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/60761 > > And I suspect that I may not have been the first to find these. > > --George
From: Gene Ward Smith (2005-11-23) Subject: Re: A new JI scale --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "George D. Secor" <gdsecor@y...> wrote: > Very nice! -- but unfortunately not new. This is one of the two best > 13-limit JI scales I came up with over 30 years ago: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/60761 > > And I suspect that I may not have been the first to find these. The Scala archive didn't have it, however.
From: Petr Parízek (2005-11-23) Subject: Re: A new JI scale Hi George. You wrote: Very nice! -- but unfortunately not new. This is one of the two best 13-limit JI scales I came up with over 30 years ago: Did you? And are there (somewhere) some recordings of music using this scale then? If there are, I'd love to hear them. You certainly understand how keen I am on music in these JI tunings, :)? Petr
From: George D. Secor (2005-11-28) Subject: Re: A new JI scale --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > > --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "George D. Secor" <gdsecor@y...> wrote: > > > Very nice! -- but unfortunately not new. This is one of the two best > > 13-limit JI scales I came up with over 30 years ago: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tuning/message/60761 > > > > And I suspect that I may not have been the first to find these. > > The Scala archive didn't have it, however. How did you determine that? In other words, how can one search for an unnamed scale or tuning in the archive? --George
From: Gene Ward Smith (2005-11-28) Subject: Re: A new JI scale --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "George D. Secor" <gdsecor@y...> wrote: > > The Scala archive didn't have it, however. > > How did you determine that? In other words, how can one search for an > unnamed scale or tuning in the archive? Use the "compare scale" command.
From: George D. Secor (2005-11-28) Subject: Re: A new JI scale --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Petr Parízek wrote: > > Hi George. > You wrote: > > Very nice! -- but unfortunately not new. This is one of the two best > 13-limit JI scales I came up with over 30 years ago: > > Did you? And are there (somewhere) some recordings of music using this scale > then? If there are, I'd love to hear them. You certainly understand how keen > I am on music in these JI tunings, :)? > Petr No, I wasn't particularly interested in subharmonics as an organizing principle for tonality above the 5-limit, so I never used it for anything. It appears, therefore, that you may still have the opportunity to be the very first to use this tuning in a composition (which I'd love to hear). You could also check with David B. Doty at the JI Network to see if he knows of anyone who has used it. --George
From: George D. Secor (2005-11-28) Subject: Re: A new JI scale --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > > --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "George D. Secor" <gdsecor@y...> wrote: > > > > The Scala archive didn't have it, however. > > > > How did you determine that? In other words, how can one search for an > > unnamed scale or tuning in the archive? > > Use the "compare scale" command. Okay -- thanks! -George